Governance / deployment

Prepared for careful government deployment language

This page is intentionally cautious. It describes alignment targets and deployment posture without claiming live certification, live integration, or live hosting.

Wording discipline

The prototype uses phrases such as “Designed to align with…,” “Prepared for…,” and “Can be deployed within…” to avoid compliance overclaim.

Source-grounded governance posture

Designed to align with GIGW 3.0 guidance on accessibility, usability, content quality, security, and performance.

Source-grounded governance posture

Prepared for deployment within state-controlled hosting environments, including MeghRaj-aligned or NIC/NICSI-style cloud setups.

Source-grounded governance posture

Prepared for security review and VAPT-style assurance workflows that commonly rely on CERT-In empanelled audit capacity.

Security scope

What is safe today, and what must be added before live government data

This makes the boundary explicit: the prototype is local and non-persistent today; a live workflow would require controlled hosting, identity, logging, and review controls.

Prototype boundary

The current build is a static frontend. Uploaded files stay in the browser session only. There is no database, no background service, and no live connection to Startup Haryana or any other departmental system.

Safe production boundary

For a live deployment, keep the workflow inside a state-controlled hosting environment, align UI and lifecycle practices with GIGW 3.0, and place application infrastructure within NIC / MeghRaj-style hosting arrangements.

Controls that should be mandatory

Role-based access, audit logs, encryption in transit and at rest, data retention policy, and security review through a CERT-In-aligned audit process should be non-negotiable before any live workflow data is handled.

What the AI should never do

It should not auto-approve, silently alter official records, pull unrelated departmental data, or send workflow files to external services without explicit government approval and deployment design.

Implemented in the prototype

Role-shaped views through page separation and officer-first task framing.
Audit trail surfaced before any final decision action.
Explicit human validation step before any readiness state changes.
Source drawer available from all major factual sections.
Simulated workflow state clearly separated from official public content.

Prepared for later implementation

Deployment within sovereign state-controlled hosting environments.
Formal role-based access control and identity integration.
Persistent audit logs, export trails, and approval records.
Security review and VAPT workflow with external audit partners.
Live NIC / departmental integration only after departmental approval.